Improved Rice Milling Quality May Help Combat Food Insecurity
When rice breaks during milling, it often goes to non-food uses, like beer brewing, reducing the number of servings available for human consumption. Broken rice is also less profitable for producers than whole kernels. Agricultural economists evaluated two scenarios to estimate how many more servings of rice Arkansas could produce using rice varieties that tend to break less during the milling process. Their research showed that a scenario with a 1 percent marginal increase in unbroken kernels after milling could hypothetically produce up to 0.89-1.05 million more servings of rice annually. The second scenario found that artificially setting all Arkansas rice grown to a minimum benchmark milling yield could produce up to 3.5 million more servings annually. The results indicate that improving milling yields could result in more food going to hungry mouths and more profit for Arkansas farmers.
The Problem
Food insecurity — when people don’t have access to enough safe and nutritious food — is a significant issue around the world. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, an estimated 1.3 billion people globally experienced food insecurity in 2022. Rice provides over 20 percent of the world’s calories and is a staple for over half the global population, according to research in the Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology.
When rice is harvested from the field, the rice grains are encased in an inedible hull and covered by a bran layer. Milling removes the hull and bran layer to reveal the white rice grain. Sometimes, rice kernels break during the milling process.
When rice breaks after milling, it may end up in non-food markets such as the pet food and brewing industries. Rice produced in Arkansas feeds some of the poorest people in the Western Hemisphere, including in Haiti, which is the largest importer of Arkansas rice. Rice varieties with higher milling quality — that is, rice that is less likely to break during the milling process — could result in more servings of rice going to feed humans.
The Work
Professor Lanier Nalley and Associate Professor Alvaro Durand-Morat, both in the agricultural economics and agribusiness department, evaluated two theoretical rice production scenarios: (1) the effect of a 1 percent marginal increase in head rice yield, and (2) the effect of setting a minimum milling yield potential. “Head rice” yield is the percentage of whole kernels over the total whole and broken milled kernels.
Nalley and Durand-Morat used Arkansas rice acreage data from 2004-2020, along with yearly variety-specific yield and milling rates from the Arkansas Rice Performance Trials. The minimum milling yield potential for the second scenario was based on Roy J, a purebred Arkansas rice variety. For example, Roy J’s head rice yield in 2015 was 61 percent. The researchers artificially set 61 percent as the minimum head rice yield for all varieties grown in Arkansas in 2015 and calculated the resulting increase in milling yield for that year.
They calculated the hypothetical increase in head rice yield for each variety harvested in Arkansas under both scenarios. The researchers then input these hypothetical milling yield values from 2004-2020 into a model that assessed the cumulative impact of the increased head rice on the market.
The Results
The results of the first scenario estimated that Arkansas could produce up to 1.05 million more servings of rice per year with a marginal 1 percent increase in head rice yield. The results of the second scenario suggested that when all rice grown in Arkansas reached the minimum milling yield matching Roy J on any given year, Arkansas could potentially produce between 2.94 and 3.5 million more rice servings annually.
The Value
When it comes to rice breeding, Nalley said rice quantity is often the focus. However, Nalley said this study emphasizes the importance of quality — in this case, defined by milling yield potential. Improving the quality of rice by reducing the amount of broken rice will result in more rice reaching consumers rather than going to non-food uses.
Additionally, since broken rice kernels often receive a discounted price, from 50 to 72 percent of the value of whole kernels, rice farmers who produce more whole kernels stand to improve their financial bottom line. Without using more inputs, like labor or fertilizer, farmers can achieve better head rice yields and, therefore, more profit.
“Increasing quality will increase producer profitability, and it gets rice into some of the poorest people’s stomachs in the world,” Nalley said.
Read the Research
Feeding More with the Same Output: How Enhanced Rice Quality Genetics Can Lead to Increased Food Security and Producer Profitability
AgEcon Search
Volume 48, Issue 3 (2023)
ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330843
About the Researcher
Read the Research
Feeding More with the Same Output: How Enhanced Rice Quality Genetics Can Lead to Increased Food Security and Producer Profitability
AgEcon Search
Volume 48, Issue 3 (2023)
ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330843
Lanier Nalley
Professor
Ph.D., Agricultural Economics/International Policy, Kansas State University
M.S., Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University
B.S., Agricultural and Development Economics, Ohio State University
Alvaro Durand-Morat
Associate Professor
Ph.D., Public Policy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
M.S., Agricultural Economics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
B.S., Agricultural Economics, National University of Entre Rios, Argentina